Diberdayakan oleh Blogger.

Popular Posts Today

Sony hacking spells diplomatic farce as China weighs in with equivocal position

Written By Unknown on Senin, 22 Desember 2014 | 00.52

HONG KONG -- The chorus of accusations over the hacking of Sony Pictures Entertainment this weekend developed into bout of diplomatic baiting and back-biting.

On Sunday China weighed in with commentary suggesting that Sony deserved its fate. That followed a move on Saturday by North Korea to offer a joint investigation with the U.S. The U.S. in turn said that North Korea would best help by owning up to being the state sponsor of the cyber vandalism.

"Any civilized world will oppose hacker attacks or terror threats. But a movie like The Interview, which makes fun of the leader of an enemy of the U.S., is nothing to be proud of for Hollywood and U.S. society," said an editorial in The Global Times, a tabloid sister paper to China's official The People's Daily.

"No matter how the U.S. society looks at North Korea and Kim Jong Un, Kim is still the leader of the country. The vicious mocking of Kim is only a result of senseless cultural arrogance," it said.

China is usually considered as the last major ally of North Korea, but the denunciation of the Sony film came as a senior Chinese army general was also laying into North Korea over its development of nuclear weapons without consulting China.

"China has cleaned up the D.P.R.K.'s mess too many times. "But it doesn't have to do that in the future," General Wang Hongguang wrote in the same Global Times. "If an administration isn't supported by the people, collapse is just a matter of time."

Whether that means that China will come to the help of the U.S. is unclear. The general's message can be read as showing that China and the U.S. are both frustrated by North Korea's manoeuvring. But it also shows that China today has less influence over North Korea that it previously did.

The Obama administration is seeking China's help in stopping North Korea from launching future cyber-attacks, the New York Times reported. "What we are looking for is a blocking action, something that would cripple their efforts to carry out attacks," an official told the paper.

On Saturday, a North Korean Foreign Ministry spokesman in capital Pyongyang proposed a joint investigation with the U.S., saying the North can prove it is not responsible for the hacking.

"The U.S. should bear in mind that it will face serious consequences in case it rejects our proposal for joint investigation and presses for what it called countermeasures while finding fault with" North Korea, the spokesman said in a statement carried by the Korean-language version of the Korean Central News Agency.

"We have a way to prove that we have nothing to do with the case without resorting to torture, as the CIA does," he said.

The U.S. government is not buying in to that. "If the North Korean government wants to help, they can admit their culpability and compensate Sony for the damages this attack caused," US National Security spokesman Mark Stroh said on Saturday.

© 2014 Variety Media, LLC, a subsidiary of Penske Business Media; Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC


00.52 | 0 komentar | Read More

New radiator for Frontier a precaution worth taking

I have a 2008 Nissan Frontier with the 4-liter engine, automatic transmission and 88,000 miles. In checking the Internet, apparently 2005-2010 Frontiers, Pathfinders and Xterras have had an issue with the radiator/transmission cooler failing, which results in coolant getting into the transmission and ruining it. Nissan states that the problem will only occur with a small percentage of vehicles. Nissan has extended the warranty on the radiator to 100,000 miles albeit with a $2,500-$3,000 deductible. I am considering proactively replacing the radiator just for the peace of mind. Do you have any recommendations on whether I should replace the radiator proactively or take my chances?

I confirmed the information you provided and understand the dilemma you face. You have three choices. Recognizing that this problem apparently affects a relatively small number of vehicles, you could ignore the issue, continue to drive your truck and keep your fingers crossed. Or, you could check the coolant and transmission fluids for correct levels or contamination on virtually a daily basis, hoping to catch the problem before it damages the transmission.

Or, as you are considering, pre-empt the issue and replace the radiator now. Since a new radiator from Nissan lists for over $650 plus three hours of labor to install it, check with cooling system specialists for a quote on installing an aftermarket radiator. I found exact-fit aftermarket radiators for your vehicle priced in the $100-$250 range at local auto parts stores.

If it were my vehicle and I could have a new radiator installed for under $500 — or install it myself for about half that — I'd be seriously inclined to do so.

I have a 2009 VW Jetta TDI. VW recommends oil changes at 10,000 miles using a synthetic that is only available at the dealer. My dealer says that VW hasn't seen any long-term detriment to using such a long interval. I understand the oils today are really superior in their protection. What do you think?

I really tried on this one. I researched, compared, pondered and cogitated — the whole nine yards. And yes, VW does recommend 10,000-mile oil change intervals on the TDI diesel engine. And yes, I don't think there would be any significant issues in following VW's recommendation.

But I just can't. I change oil and filter on our 2010 Passat Wagon equipped with the 2-liter turbo gasoline engine every 4,000-5,000 miles. I would do the same if it were the TDI. In this case, I see no downside in being pro-active on oil changes. Besides, it's your vehicle. You're responsible for it and you're going to pay for any repairs or excess depreciation. On top of that, the added cost for the extra oil changes is such a very, very small percentage of the total cost of ownership, depreciation, maintenance, repairs, licensing and insurance over the life of the vehicle, I don't think it should be a factor in your decision.

I am 5 feet 3 and I really like my new 2014 Honda Civic LX five-speed manual, but my left knee is only one tiny speck away from the dash and I am not 10 inches from the steering wheel, which would be dangerous if the air bag deployed. I called my dealership, my regular mechanic and a well-known body shop but I cannot find anyone who will install pedal extenders for me — apparently it's a liability issue. Could a non-mechanic like me buy pedal extenders and put them on myself?

Yes, you could. Pedal extenders are not difficult to install and I'm sure you could successfully install a set in your Civic. But before you do, check with local handicap/mobility stores in your area, specifically a store that specializes in building or outfitting handicap-equipped vehicles.

Go online to the National Mobility Equipment Dealers Association — NMEDA — at www.nmeda.com for a list of authorized handicap equipment installers in your area.


00.52 | 0 komentar | Read More

Research shows owners coming up short on home values

WASHINGTON — Do American homeowners think their properties are worth less than the actual market value, as measured by professional appraisers?

Highly unlikely, you'd probably say. Everybody knows that owners tend to have optimistic impressions of what their homes are worth. They know how much money they've sunk into improving the place and they know — or think they know — the prices for houses in the neighborhood.

But provocative new research from the country's second-largest mortgage lender suggests the opposite may be true. According to new statistical analyses by Quicken Loans, owners on average now underestimate the value of their homes by 1.6 percent compared with appraisers' valuations.

Using massive databases of 50,000 to 60,000 new applications for mortgage refinancings per month, Quicken has created what it calls the Home Price Perception Index to measure the differences between owners' upfront estimates — routinely provided to loan officers as part of the application process — and the appraisals that are subsequently performed.

During November, owners seeking to refinance in roughly three-quarters of the major metropolitan areas covered by the index had lower estimates of their homes' worth than what turned out to be the appraised value, according to researchers. The dollar differences were not huge in most cases — between $2,000 and $4,000 on a $200,000 home. But in a few markets they were considerably larger. Owners in San Jose, Calif., estimated their houses to be worth 
6 percent less than the value subsequently determined by appraisers. With a median sale price of $860,000 for existing homes during the third quarter, a 6 percent perception gap translates into big bucks — $51,600.

In Los Angeles, applicants for refinancings underestimated values on average by 3.8 percent ($482,000 estimate versus $499,641 appraisal); in Seattle, the gap was 2.8 percent ($360,000 versus $370,080); Miami 2.3 percent ($270,000 versus $276,210); Boston 2.2 percent ($400,000 versus $408,880). In the Washington, D.C., area, the gap was 1.8 percent ($389,000 versus $395,885).

Owners overestimated values in a handful of major markets. In Philadelphia, the gap was 1.6 percent, Charlotte, N.C., 
1.3 percent and Chicago 0.3 percent. Quicken researchers found the widespread pattern of undervaluation is in distinct contrast with owners' estimates a few years ago, which often were far out of sync with appraisers' reports.

At the peak of the housing bubble in 2005-06, appraisals often came in below owners' estimates, in part because prices were spiraling upward at double-digit rates in overheated markets. In the recession years following the bust, the gap between what owners believed their homes to be worth and appraisers' valuations gradually narrowed, and by 2013, with the market rebounding solidly in many areas, it virtually disappeared. More recently, the trend has shifted to slight underestimations by owners.

Why are owners a little behind on pricing? Quicken chief economist Bob Walters attributes it in part to the fact that owners are more likely than professional appraisers to lag market trends. "Appraisers are looking at the market all the time," he said in an interview. Owners, especially those who are seeking to refinance but not sell, aren't as likely to stay on top of month-to-month changes.

Appraisers I contacted for reactions generally were skeptical of the Quicken index findings. Kenneth J. Mullinix of Laguna Beach, Calif., said "never" in 20 years in the business "have I done an appraisal where the owner has said to me, 'Wow, the appraised value is higher than I thought."

But one nationally known appraisal expert, Gary Crabtree of Bakersfield, Calif., thinks that Quicken may be on to something. "Today's homeowners have access to numerous (online) valuation tools and multiple listing service systems that they didn't have" until recently, he said in an email. As a result, they "tend to more closely track the market conditions in their neighborhood."

Does it matter much if you underestimate your home's worth by a percentage point or two? It definitely does if you plan to sell — you could end up leaving money on the table.


00.52 | 0 komentar | Read More

Inspections show high pricing accuracy in Massachusetts

BOSTON — Last-minute holiday shoppers can shop with confidence that prices will be accurate.

A check on prices in 124 stores throughout Massachusetts showed the highest level of pricing accuracy in a decade.

The survey by the Massachusetts Division of Standards showed that of 3,150 items checked by inspectors, 99.94 percent were found to be accurately priced when compared with the lowest advertised price on the item or the shelf.

Division of Standards Director Charles Carroll said retailers who have installed in-aisle consumer price scanners are not required to individually price mark each item. That has eliminated some pricing errors.

The inspections were done in November in 27 communities, including Concord, Mansfield, Newburyport, Pittsfield, Plymouth and Springfield.


00.52 | 0 komentar | Read More

Fox News, Fox Business removed from Dish in carriage-rights spat

Fox News Channel and Fox Business Network are not currently available on satellite-broadcaster Dish Network, the result of an impasse in carriage talks between the two companies.

Dish said in a statement early Sunday morning that 21st Century Fox had blocked access to the two networks after Dish balked when rates for other networks owned by the media conglomerate were made a part of the negotiations. Tim Carry, executive vice president of distribution at Fox News Channel, countered in a statement that "Dish prematurely ceased distribution of Fox News in an attempt to intimidate and sway our negotiations. It is unfortunate that the millions of Fox News viewers on Dish were used as pawns by their provider. Hopefully they will vote with their hard earned money and seek another one of our other valued distributors immediately."

Dish said it had offered a short-term contract extension that would have kept Fox News Channel and Fox Business Network on the air as the two parties continued to haggle over terms.

"Fox blacked out two of its news channels, using them as leverage to triple rates on sports and entertainment channels that are not in this contract." said Warren Schlichting, senior vice president of programming for Dish, in a company statement. "It's like we're about to close on a house and the realtor is trying to make us buy a new car as well," he said separately in the company's release.

Dish said it had offered a short-term contract extension that would have kept Fox News Channel and Fox Business Network on the air as the two parties continued to haggle over terms.

"Dish has had a productive relationship with Fox for many years," said Schlichting. "We regret the service disruption to our customers, and remain committed to reaching an agreement that promptly returns this content to Dish's programming lineup."

Fox's Carry said the company was disappointed by the breakdown in talks and noted Dish's stance in recent negotiations has resulted in three different blackouts of service in recent weeks, a reference to recent flare-ups between Dish and both Time Warner's Turner unit and CBS Corp. Fox News has been transmitted by Dish for nearly two decades without a blackout, Carry said.

"We care deeply about our viewers and hope that they will regain access to the number one cable news channel soon. We will continue to work around the clock to reach an agreement with Dish, as we have done with every other pay-TV provider for 18 years," said Carry. "This is the third time in as many months that Dish customers have suffered through a blackout due to Dish's intransigence."

Dish found itself at odds with both Time Warner's Turner and CBS Corp., both of which resulted in brief outages of such popular cable outlets as CNN and Cartoon Network. CBS was briefly off Dish for a matter of hours earlier this month but was back on the system after the two parties came to terms quickly after the broadcast network went dark.

Dish provides service to about 14 million people in the United States.

© 2014 Variety Media, LLC, a subsidiary of Penske Business Media; Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC


00.52 | 0 komentar | Read More

US companies eager to embrace Cuba face hurdles

WASHINGTON — Cargill aims to sell more corn and soybeans. MasterCard covets another site for Americans to swipe credit cards. Marriott sees beachfront property that needs hotels.

And outside Orlando, Florida, Danny Howell just knows there would be demand for his classic Chevrolet parts.

American businesses have begun imagining ways to capitalize on last week's announcement that the United States will restore diplomatic ties with Cuba and ease curbs on trade with one of the last surviving Communist regimes.

Their more ambitious plans would require that Congress lift the U.S. embargo on most exports to Cuba. Given sharp resistance from some in Congress, that might not happen soon. But many analysts think Congress will repeal the embargo eventually.

"It's great news — it's a totally untapped market," said Seth Kaplowitz, a lawyer and lecturer in finance at San Diego State University.

All that said, Cuba experts have a message for any business that might be envisioning easy riches:

Be patient.

After years of rigid market planning in Cuba and the half-century-old U.S. embargo, restoring economic ties to something close to normal is likely to be complex and time-consuming. The United States must change laws and regulations, and Cuba must build an economy more hospitable to foreign investment.

"The Cuban government has a long way to go and a lot more to do," said Jodi Bond, vice president of the Americas at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. "I don't think any businesses are under the illusion that this is going to be an easy transition or the floodgates will open."

Still, the prospects are tantalizing.

Economists at the Peterson Institute for International Economics estimate that the export of U.S. goods to Cuba could eventually reach $4.3 billion annually, up from just $360 million in 2013. And Cuban exports of goods to the United States could reach $5.8 billion, from zero now.

A full lifting of the U.S. trade embargo could benefit, among others, U.S. farmers, auto and tractor makers, airline and hotel companies and telecom equipment makers. The United States now sells Cuba about $350 million a year in farm products, including rice corn, soybeans and frozen chicken parts, according to the American Farm Bureau. A 2000 law relaxed restrictions on food and medical exports.

Those exports could surge once the United States eases restrictions on financial transactions, which could happen soon. Cuban buyers of U.S. agricultural goods are required to pay up front, though international trade is usually done on credit.

"We have been pretty much hamstrung by the financial constraints," said Devry Boughner Vorwerk, a vice president at Cargill, the agriculture giant. She called the U.S. move "a great first step."

U.S.-based travel companies have been eager to embrace the Caribbean island, just an hour's flight from Miami. Delta Air Lines, JetBlue Airways, Hilton Worldwide, Marriott International and the Carnival Corp. all expressed interest last week, though most of their plans would have to await a repeal of the embargo.

CEO Arne Sorenson said in a statement that Marriott looks "forward to opening hotels in Cuba, as companies from other countries have done already."

Apple Leisure Group, which books 2 million vacation packages to the Caribbean a year and is about to open its 38th hotel in the region, is developing a plan for Cuba.

"We could very rapidly put charters onto the island" or buy a hotel and convert it into one of its Sunscape brand resorts, CEO Alex Zozaya said. He envisions a market for the company's higher-end hotels, like Secrets and Dreams.

Eventually, that is.

"Cuba does not have the right infrastructure yet to satisfy the mid-to-high-end market," Zozaya said.

Cuba, which can appear stuck in a 1950s time warp, desperately needs investment. The island lags far behind its neighbors Haiti and the Dominican Republic in the proportion of its economic output that goes into public infrastructure like roads, factories and housing. In fact, Cuba has one of the lowest investment rates in the world, according to the World Bank.

If the embargo is lifted, U.S. refiners could find a new market in Cuba for gasoline and diesel or refining technology. Cuba has been struggling to find a partner to finance an upgrade and expansion of its largest refinery. And suppliers of electric power generation and transmission equipment, like General Electric, could help improve and expand electricity services on the island.

American technology firms will likely be interested in putting Cubans to work assembling electronic components, taking advantage of low-wage labor far closer to the United States than India and China are.

But businesses eager to break into Cuba will face numerous obstacles:

— THE U.S. GOVERNMENT

President Barack Obama's announcement only relaxed restrictions on traveling and doing business in Cuba. And even Obama's limited action will require government regulators to craft new rules. The United States, for example, will now let companies like John Deere sell tractors to small private Cuban farmers but not to government-run farms. Yet it's not clear how the eligible farms will be defined.

"All these regulations have to be written; it's not simple," says Kirby Jones, a consultant on U.S.-Cuba trade issues. "That could take weeks or months."

— CUBA'S GOVERNMENT

Havana has sent mixed messages about its appetite for foreign involvement in its economy. In March, Cuba passed a law meant to attract foreign investment. But in September, it jailed a Canadian executive on corruption charges — a move that sent a chill through the expatriate community.

"The climate for foreign investment is not that great," said Archibald Ritter, an economist at Carleton University in Ottawa who specializes in Cuba. Ritter said foreign companies that want to enter the Cuban market might be required to establish joint ventures with state-owned firms.

China required such arrangements as it opened its economy in the 1980s and 1990s, and many U.S. and other foreign companies found the joint ventures useless and costly.

—THE CUBAN ECONOMY

Cuba is hardly rich. Its economy ranks No. 69 in the world, about the size of Hawaii's. Income per person is just $6,200, according to the United Nations. That means that Detroit automakers, for example, are unlikely to enjoy big sales in Cuba.

"Nobody can buy a brand-new car," said Karl Brauer, senior analyst for Kelley Blue Book.

U.S. car sales have been banned in Cuba since 1959. Cubans have been have been forced to patch together Fords, Chevrolets and Chryslers that date back to before Fidel Castro's revolution.

Since the Communist economic system isn't likely to change soon, many of those cars will have to stay on the road for years. That could mean an opportunity for U.S. companies that make or distribute vintage car parts, Brauer said.

Enter Danny Howell, who sells parts for classic Chevrolets near Orlando. His business, Southeast Chevy Parts Inc., specializes in original parts dating to 1955.

Howell, who scours car ads and storage facilities to buy cars for parts, already sells indirectly to Cuba. U.S. citizens who have Cuban relatives often buy parts and send them to Cuba to keep the old cars running. Demand should grow as trade restrictions are eased, Howell said.

"I would be delighted if the door were opened," he says.

___

AP Business Writers Scott Mayerowitz, Jonathan Fahey, Ken Sweet and Barbara Ortutay in New York, Michael Liedtke in San Francisco, Christopher S. Rugaber in Washington and Tom Krisher in Detroit contributed to this report.


00.52 | 0 komentar | Read More

Studio Babelsberg braces for $3 million annual loss

BERLIN -- Despite major projects this year, including Steven Spielberg's latest Cold War drama and the "Point Break" remake, Germany's Studio Babelsberg is expecting a €2.5 million ($3 million) loss for 2014.

In an interview with German financial newspaper Handelsblatt on Friday, Studio Babelsberg president and CEO Charlie Woebcken said he hoped the studio would survive next year. Separately, the studio's vice president and chief operating officer, Christoph Fisser, told German news agency DPA that the company lacked planning certainty after two key productions it was banking on this year failed to materialize.

The studio is forecasting 2014 revenue of €50 million ($61.1 million), down from €81.9 million ($100.1 million) last year.

Studio Babelsberg has regularly fluctuated between annual losses and profits over the years, depending the number of international co-productions they had in any given year. In 2013, for example, the studio posted a profit of €843,000 ($1.03 million) after suffering a hefty loss of €7.2 million ($8.8 million) the year before, which in turn followed a 2011 profit of €356,000 ($435,362). Due to the studio's somewhat erratic business operations and difficulties in maintaining stable revenue levels, the company is planning to delist from the stock market in 2016.

Studio Babelsberg execs have also lobbied hard against plans by the German government to cut federal film subsidies by €10 million ($12.2 million) next year -- a move that could hit the studio particularly hard. The Bundesrat, one of the two houses of Germany's parliament, voted on Friday to maintain the German Federal Film Fund (DFFF) at its current level of €60 million ($73.4 million) a year -- a positive signal that may move Chancellor Angela Merkel's government to reconsider the decision.

The DFFF has been instrumental for Studio Babelsberg in luring major international productions to Germany, including recent productions like Spielberg's untitled Cold War drama starring Tom Hanks, Ericson Core's $100 million "Point Break" remake, which received $4.4 million in support, and Francis Lawrence's "The Hunger Games: Mockingjay," which secured nearly $5 million.

Nearly 30 international co-productions have benefited from DFFF coin this year, including Eran Creevy's high-speed actioner "Autobahn," starring Nicholas Hoult, with €2.58 million ($3.15 million).

© 2014 Variety Media, LLC, a subsidiary of Penske Business Media; Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC


00.52 | 0 komentar | Read More

US mulls putting NKorea on terrorism sponsor list

HONOLULU — President Barack Obama says the United States is reviewing whether to put North Korea back on its list of state sponsors of terrorism as Washington decides how to respond to what he calls an "act of cybervandalism," not one of war, against a movie company.

Sony Pictures Entertainment, which said it canceled the theatrical release of "The Interview" after distributors refused to show it, pledged to find a way to get the film out. "How it's going to be distributed, I don't think anybody knows quite yet," a Sony lawyer said. The comedy involves a plot to assassinate North Korea's leader.

Obama is promising to respond "proportionately" to an attack that law enforcement blames on North Korea. "We're not going to be intimidated by some cyberhackers," he said.

The president said the U.S. would examine the facts to determine whether North Korea should land back on the terrorism sponsors list.

"We're going to review those through a process that's already in place," Obama told CNN's "State of the Union" in an interview broadcast Sunday. "I'll wait to review what the findings are."

While raising the possibility of a terrorism designation, Obama also asserted, "I don't think it was an act of war. I think it was an act of cybervandalism that was very costly, very expensive. We take it very seriously."

Obama's description drew immediate scorn from two Republicans who are longtime critics of his foreign policy.

"It is a new form of warfare, and we have to counter with that form of warfare with a better form of warfare," said Arizona Sen. John McCain.

Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina called it "an act of terrorism" and favored reimposing sanctions and adding North Korea to the terrorism list. The U.S. needs to "make is so hard on the North Koreans that they don't want to do this in the future."

North Korea spent two decades on the list until the Bush administration removed it in 2008 during nuclear negotiations. Only Iran, Sudan, Syria and Cuba remain on the list, which triggers sanctions that limit U.S. aid, defense exports and certain financial transactions.

But adding North Korea back could be difficult. To meet the criteria, the State Department must determine that a country has repeatedly supported acts of international terrorism, a definition that traditionally has referred to violent, physical attacks rather than hacking.

North Korea threatened to strike back at the United States if Obama retaliated, the National Defense Commission said in a statement carried by the country's official Korean Central News Agency. The statement offered no details of a possible response.

The U.S. is asking China for help as it considers how to respond to the hack. A senior Obama administration official says the U.S. and China have shared information about the attack and that Washington has asked for Beijing's cooperation.

The official was not authorized to comment by name and spoke on condition of anonymity.

China wields considerable leverage over North Korea, but Obama has accused China of carrying out cyberthefts, too.

In the CNN interview, taped Friday in Washington before Obama left to vacation in Hawaii, Obama renewed his criticism of Sony's decision to shelve "The Interview," despite the company's insistence that its hand was forced after movie theaters refused to show it.

Obama suggested he might have been able to help address the problem if given the chance. "You know, had they talked to me directly about this decision, I might have called the movie theater chains and distributors and asked them what that story was," he said.

Sony's CEO has disputed that the company never reached out, saying he spoke to a senior White House adviser about the situation before Sony announced the decision. White House officials said Sony did discuss cybersecurity with the federal government, but that the White House was never consulted on the decision not to distribute the film.

"Sometimes this is a matter of setting a tone and being very clear that we're not going to be intimidated by some, you know, cyberhackers," Obama said. "And I expect all of us to remember that and operate on that basis going forward."

David Boies, a Sony lawyer, said "The Interview" is "going to be distributed, and what Sony has been trying to do is to get the picture out to the public," while protecting the rights of company employers and moviegoers.

Boies said theaters "quite understandably" decided not to show the film as scheduled because of the threats. "You can't release a movie unless you have a distribution channel," he said.

North Korea has denied hacking the studio, and on Saturday proposed a joint investigation with the U.S. to determine the true culprit. The White House rejected the idea and said it was confident North Korea was responsible.

But the next decision — how to respond — is hanging over the president as he vacations with his family in Hawaii.

Obama's options are limited. The U.S. already has trade penalties in place and there is no appetite for military action.

"I think we've got to recognize that this is not a Sony security problem. This is a national security problem," Boies said.

Boies appeared on NBC's "Meet the Press," Graham was on CBS' "Face the Nation" and McCain spoke on CNN.

___

Reach Josh Lederman at http://twitter.com/joshledermanAP


00.52 | 0 komentar | Read More

Canadian man told to pay $1.5 million for credit card fraud

FARGO, N.D. — It took nearly eight years from the time a Toronto man was arrested in a massive credit card fraud scheme, but a federal judge has figured out how much each victim is owed.

Adekunle Adetiloye (aw-duh-KUHN-lee aw-duh-tuh-LOH'-ee) pleaded guilty earlier to mail fraud and was sentenced to 18 years in prison. Authorities say he stole the identities of about 38,000 people in order to bilk dozen of banks.

U.S. District Judge Ralph Erickson ruled earlier this month that Adetiloye should pay about $1.5 million in restitution and forfeiture. Adetiloye is appealing the ruling.

Prosecutors say Adetiloye was the leader of an international scheme that involved fake debt-collection agencies.

It's not clear whether any of the victims will be paid. Adetiloye's lawyer would not comment on his client's financial situation.


00.52 | 0 komentar | Read More

Republicans urge theaters to show 'Interview': 'we cannot be bullied into giving up freedom'

The Republican National Committee is urging theater owners to play the "The Interview" following Sony's decision to pull the plug on the controversial comedy, CNN reports.

RNC chairman Reince Priebus has sent a letter to the CEOs of 10 major theater chains asking them to show the film, which has been the source of hackers' wrath in the last month.

"I want to speak clearly on behalf of the Republican Party: I urge you to show the movie," Priebus wrote to the CEOs, according to CNN. "As a sign of my commitment, if you agree to show this movie, I will send a note to the Republican Party's millions of donors and supporters urging them to buy a ticket -- not to support one movie or Hollywood, but to show North Korea we cannot be bullied into giving up our freedom."

On Friday, President Barack Obama declared that Sony "made a mistake" in cancelling "The Interview's" release.

"I wish they had spoken to me first. … We cannot have a society in which some dictator someplace can start imposing censorship," Obama said at a news conference, referring to Sony execs. His speech has since been praised by conservative political pundits.

Sony Pictures Entertainment chairman Michael Lynton has defended the studio's decision, insisting that they "had no choice" but to cancel the Christmas release following hackers' threats of 9/11-like violence that forced theaters to pull the film.

"We have not caved. We have not given in. We have persevered," Lynton told CNN in an interview that will air on "AC360" on Sunday.

The RNC letter also said that a foreign regime -- referring to North Korea, which the FBI has linked to the cyber-attacks -- shouldn't "dictate the movies we can and cannot watch."

"As you know, the Republican Party and Hollywood have at times been at odds," the letter continued. "But we can all agree that the current situation regarding the release of 'The Interview' goes far beyond politics. It is about freedom and free enterprise."

© 2014 Variety Media, LLC, a subsidiary of Penske Business Media; Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC


00.52 | 0 komentar | Read More
techieblogger.com Techie Blogger Techie Blogger